Risk, Shocks, Growth, Aid and Poverty

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are countries vulnerable to adverse shocks less able to foster growth and to translate growth into poverty reduction? Can aid help?

PROJECT

Much micro-level evidence has highlighted the role of risk and shocks on poverty and low growth at the household level. However, its implications for overall growth are not well documented, let alone how it affects poverty. The first objective of this work is to investigate the impact on growth of the presence of integrate various sources of risk into a more standard cross-section growth regressions framework with an emphasis on risk relevant for the rural sector: commodity prices and weather risk. Indeed, high vulnerability to adverse shocks is strongly correlated by economies not able to have made the transition from an agriculture-dependent economy. For a sample of the poorest African and Asian economies, we ask whether the underlying risk as well as particular shocks have persistent growth effects, beyond transitory effects. Next, we ask whether the poverty-growth elasticity in the economy (the rate at which growth translates into poverty reduction) is affected if an economy is more vulnerable to adverse shocks. There are good theoretical grounds to suspect that economies with more risk and growth volatility may transmit growth less readily in poverty reduction than others. If so, it may argue strongly for institutional designs of growth and development strategies that pay more attention to risk-reduction and mitigation (such as via forms of social protection policies). However, macro-instruments, via aid, may also help to reduce the underlying volatility in growth. In ongoing work, we are also investigating whether the adverse effects of commodity price volatility can be cushioned by aid. Using co-integration techniques we find that adverse price shocks lower the growth of exporters but that this adverse effect is itself significantly reduced the higher are prior flows of aid. An implication is that vulnerability to adverse shocks might be an additional criterion in aid allocation.

RESEARCHERS

Paul Collier

University of Oxford

Stefan Dercon

University of Oxford

Benedikt Goderis

University of Oxford

OUTPUT

Natural Resource Booms and Inequality: Theory and Evidence

Benedikt Goderis and Samuel Malone

Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(2), May 2011

Does Aid Mitigate External Shocks

Paul Collier and Benedikt Goderis

Review of Development Economics, Volume 13 Issue 3, pp.429-451, March 2009

Structural Policies for Shock-Prone Developing Countries

Paul Collier and Benedikt Goderis

CSAE Working Paper WPS/2009-03, March 2009

Natural Resource Boom and Inequality: Theory and Evidence

Benedikt Goderis and Samuel W. Malone

CSAE Working Paper WPS/2008-11, March 2008

Does Aid Mitigate External Shocks

Paul Collier and Benedikt Goderis

CSAE WPS/2007-18, 2008

Commodity Prices, Growth and the Natural Resource Curse: Reconciling a Conundrum

Paul Collier and Benedikt Goderis

CSAE working paper WPS/2007-15

4 ways to improve the lives of the 'bottom billion'

Paul Collier

TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design), 2008

Collier on the Bottom Billion

Paul Collier

Podcast, Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008

Does Aid Mitigate External Shocks

Paul Collier and Benedikt Goderis

WIDER Discussion Paper, Vol 2008/06, 2008

Monetary Policy and Oil Price Surges in Nigeria

Benedikt Goderis and Christopher Adam

In Paul Collier, Catherine Pattillo and Charles Soludo (eds.) Economic Policy Options for a Prosperous Nigeria, Palgrave Macmillan, April 2008

The Bottom Billion

Paul Collier

Carnegie Council, 2008

The Divergence of the Bottom Billion

Paul Collier

DESTIN and STICERD public lecture, Oct 2007